tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702972381435105050.post2889457612209871748..comments2023-11-20T01:40:56.396-08:00Comments on CyberSecPolitics: The Force Awakens: Dec 8 Wassenaar Meeting NotesDave Aitelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17021799961866070637noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702972381435105050.post-24699308626197992782015-12-09T18:34:06.909-08:002015-12-09T18:34:06.909-08:00Dave - thanks for taking the time and providing a ...Dave - thanks for taking the time and providing a useful summary - much appreciatedAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2702972381435105050.post-30192734412851056702015-12-09T12:07:07.642-08:002015-12-09T12:07:07.642-08:00Great summary, thanks for posting. I would add a ...Great summary, thanks for posting. I would add a fifth factor to your reasons why other countries don't seem to be having any issues: 5. Other Wassenaar countries, including many EU countries, have favorable license exceptions for exports of intrusion software to friendly countries, including the U.S. And, importantly, they don't have a policy of denial for 0-days. So in other words, if you are a company in the UK, you can export intrusion delivery software to the U.S. under a license exception, even if it supports 0-days or rootkits. But not true vise versa.cryptohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13128741947206075315noreply@blogger.com